L2TP Client: Other Routers: Difference between revisions

Back up to the Incoming L2TP Category
From AAISP Support Site
(Created page with "==TP-Link== The TL-WR741ND router works, although it can only do NAT, but is very cheap.")
 
(→‎top: clean up)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__<indicator name="L2TP">[[File:Menu-L2TP.svg|link=:Category:Incoming L2TP|30px|Back up to the Incoming L2TP Category]]</indicator>
[[Category:Incoming L2TP]]
==TP-Link==
==TP-Link==
The TL-WR741ND router works, although it can only do NAT, but is very cheap.
The TL-WR741ND router works, although it can only do NAT, but is very cheap.

==Juniper==
It is worth noting that as of 2017-07-31 Juniper SRX can '''not''' be used as an L2TP client:

https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/42862/how-to-configure-l2tp-client-on-juniper-srx

Latest revision as of 00:02, 18 August 2018

TP-Link

The TL-WR741ND router works, although it can only do NAT, but is very cheap.

Juniper

It is worth noting that as of 2017-07-31 Juniper SRX can not be used as an L2TP client:

https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/42862/how-to-configure-l2tp-client-on-juniper-srx