TTLatency: Difference between revisions

From AAISP Support Site
mNo edit summary
(clean up, typos fixed: along side → alongside, it it → it is, Eg, → E.g.,)
 
(41 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:TalkTalk minimum Latency Jumps}}
<gallery mode="packed">
TTLatency1.png|Caption1
TTLatency2.png|Caption2
TTLatency3.png|Caption2
TTLatency4.png|Caption2
TTLatency5.png|Caption2
TTLatency6.png|Caption2
TTLatency7.png|Caption2
TTLatency8.png|Caption2
TTLatency9.png|Caption2
TTLatency10.png|Caption2
TTLatency11.png|Caption2


==Timeline==
2017-04-07 - Page created showing examples and giving a brief description of the problem.

2017-10-21 - Added a note about a potential longer term fix (bottom of page)

==Introduction==

We see latency jumps of about 3-5ms on some TalkTalk connected lines. This typically happens after a re-connection where the circuit is routed to a different LNS (the router at the AAISP side).

This isn't a fault as such, it's more of a phenomenon, and therefore we are wanting to better understand why this happens and to help our customers understand it too.

==Purpose of this page==
This page will be updated with information about the issue and will show examples, we will also open a Status page to go alongside this page.

==Examples==

Here are some example graphs from our line monitoring. The latency is shown as the blue line at the base of the graph, and a change is shown as it increasing or decreasing by a few pixels.

<gallery mode="nolines" widths="1005" caption="Example graphs showing latency jumps">
TTLatency1.png|Jump down at 9am
TTLatency2.png|Jump down at 8pm
TTLatency3.png|Jump up at 10am
TTLatency4.png|Jump down at noon
TTLatency5.png|Jump down at 1am
TTLatency6.png|Jump down at 1am
TTLatency7.png|Jump up at 9pm
TTLatency8.png|Jump up at 3pm
TTLatency9.png|Jump down at 10:30am
TTLatency10.png|Jump up at 1am
TTLatency11.png|Jump down at 6pm
</gallery>
</gallery>

==How does this affect customers?==
The impact is usually low or zero. A few extra milliseconds is not noticed in practice by most customers, it's not enough to impact the majority of services, VoIP will still work unaffected etc.

It is noticeable on the graphs that we produce and has understandably been questioned by a number of customers.

==When does this happen?==
This typically happens when a lines is moved between LNSs at our side. The reason this makes a difference is that the circuit will be routed through a different 'tunnel' and this new tunnel is routed the other way through TalkTalk's network.

==Why does this happen?==
In very simplified terms, TalkTalk run a ring network that goes around the UK, and traffic and can go around this ring one in of two directions. One direction is shorter and the other longer - hence if your circuit is being routed on the longer path, then the latency will be higher.

==What can be done?==
We don't have any direct control over the route your circuit will take within the TalkTalk network, so in some ways it is pot luck as to which path you are on. However, TalkTalk are looking in to this to see is it's possible for any improvement. We are helping them on this project.

A temporary fix may be to adjust the case of your username befiore the @ part in your router settings. E.g., if your username is customer@a.1, then try cuSTOMer@a.1 or some other variation. If you have multiple lines, then make the username match on all of them. This will mean you will connect to a different LNS ar our side, which in turn will change the routing within the TalkTalk network. You may still get re-routed when you log in again next, but you can try the same trick again if that is the case.

This is an unsupported feature. Usually all usernames would be lower case, and our support team may will advise you to change to all lower case in the event of a problem or fault.

Longer term, early 2018, we expect this problem to go away due to works on the TalkTalk network. This is unconfirmed and un tested though, so we have to wait and see. TalkTalk have told us (unofficially) that they have a project to help with the latency jumps described here. The project involves using optimised (lower latency) routes rather than random routes.

Latest revision as of 00:20, 18 August 2018


Timeline

2017-04-07 - Page created showing examples and giving a brief description of the problem.

2017-10-21 - Added a note about a potential longer term fix (bottom of page)

Introduction

We see latency jumps of about 3-5ms on some TalkTalk connected lines. This typically happens after a re-connection where the circuit is routed to a different LNS (the router at the AAISP side).

This isn't a fault as such, it's more of a phenomenon, and therefore we are wanting to better understand why this happens and to help our customers understand it too.

Purpose of this page

This page will be updated with information about the issue and will show examples, we will also open a Status page to go alongside this page.

Examples

Here are some example graphs from our line monitoring. The latency is shown as the blue line at the base of the graph, and a change is shown as it increasing or decreasing by a few pixels.

How does this affect customers?

The impact is usually low or zero. A few extra milliseconds is not noticed in practice by most customers, it's not enough to impact the majority of services, VoIP will still work unaffected etc.

It is noticeable on the graphs that we produce and has understandably been questioned by a number of customers.

When does this happen?

This typically happens when a lines is moved between LNSs at our side. The reason this makes a difference is that the circuit will be routed through a different 'tunnel' and this new tunnel is routed the other way through TalkTalk's network.

Why does this happen?

In very simplified terms, TalkTalk run a ring network that goes around the UK, and traffic and can go around this ring one in of two directions. One direction is shorter and the other longer - hence if your circuit is being routed on the longer path, then the latency will be higher.

What can be done?

We don't have any direct control over the route your circuit will take within the TalkTalk network, so in some ways it is pot luck as to which path you are on. However, TalkTalk are looking in to this to see is it's possible for any improvement. We are helping them on this project.

A temporary fix may be to adjust the case of your username befiore the @ part in your router settings. E.g., if your username is customer@a.1, then try cuSTOMer@a.1 or some other variation. If you have multiple lines, then make the username match on all of them. This will mean you will connect to a different LNS ar our side, which in turn will change the routing within the TalkTalk network. You may still get re-routed when you log in again next, but you can try the same trick again if that is the case.

This is an unsupported feature. Usually all usernames would be lower case, and our support team may will advise you to change to all lower case in the event of a problem or fault.

Longer term, early 2018, we expect this problem to go away due to works on the TalkTalk network. This is unconfirmed and un tested though, so we have to wait and see. TalkTalk have told us (unofficially) that they have a project to help with the latency jumps described here. The project involves using optimised (lower latency) routes rather than random routes.