Category:Bonding: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
MLPPP (Multilink PPP) Is not supported - it was originally designed for ISDN, and AAISP take the view that bonding at the IP level is the way to do bonding. |
MLPPP (Multilink PPP) Is not supported - it was originally designed for ISDN, and AAISP take the view that bonding at the IP level is the way to do bonding. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
==Advantages== |
==Advantages== |
||
| Line 65: | Line 64: | ||
The alternative if to use separate routers. These would normally share a /29 interlink subnet and connect to some firewall or router within you network, routing a static IP block to that router. The interlink address block could be private IPv4 addresses but you do not want NAT or fire-walling on the external routers even in that case as it will not handle the bonding. In general using the FireBrick and PPPoE is simpler and more flexible. |
The alternative if to use separate routers. These would normally share a /29 interlink subnet and connect to some firewall or router within you network, routing a static IP block to that router. The interlink address block could be private IPv4 addresses but you do not want NAT or fire-walling on the external routers even in that case as it will not handle the bonding. In general using the FireBrick and PPPoE is simpler and more flexible. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
==Tunnelled bonding== |
==Tunnelled bonding== |
||