VoIP NAT: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:00, 29 May 2014 view source AA-Andrew (talk \| contribs) autoreview, Bureaucrats, editor, Interface administrators, reviewer, Administrators 12,652 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:00, 29 May 2014 view source AA-Andrew (talk \| contribs) autoreview, Bureaucrats, editor, Interface administrators, reviewer, Administrators 12,652 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	NAT on our Voiceless ~~server~~ does work in many cases. However, due to the nature of NAT, and the numerous implementation and 'fixes' and 'bodges' in routers, it can be tricky to get working. Lots of the phones that we've tested do just work without the need for an ALG, stun, port forwarding etc), but other network equipment (ie the router) may get in the way.		NAT on our Voiceless platform does work in many cases. However, due to the nature of NAT, and the numerous implementation and 'fixes' and 'bodges' in routers, it can be tricky to get working. Lots of the phones that we've tested do just work without the need for an ALG, stun, port forwarding etc), but other network equipment (ie the router) may get in the way.

	We'd always suggest using public IP addresses for VoIP devices.		We'd always suggest using public IP addresses for VoIP devices.