Packet Loss: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
The best measure of loss as a simple percentage is the loss when sending full size packets (1500 bytes) which is what the data transfer protocols (like TCP) use. Even a 1% or 2% of loss of such packets can cause TCP to slow down massively. It does not work like taking away a couple of percent of speed - the data transfers keep slowing down as they keep thinking the line must be full. |
The best measure of loss as a simple percentage is the loss when sending full size packets (1500 bytes) which is what the data transfer protocols (like TCP) use. Even a 1% or 2% of loss of such packets can cause TCP to slow down massively. It does not work like taking away a couple of percent of speed - the data transfers keep slowing down as they keep thinking the line must be full. |
||
[[File: |
[[File:CQM-heavyloss.png|Packet loss on an idle line is always bad news).]] |
||
Packet loss on an idle line is always bad news... |
Packet loss on an idle line is always bad news... |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
...even if only 1% (one red dot at the top is 1%) |
...even if only 1% (one red dot at the top is 1%) |
||
==2% loss is not like 98% working speed== |
==2% loss is not like 98% working speed== |
||